BarnabyNutt

00000 Million

img_8682-2For week 2 of the #FP4Party, I thought I’d use that roll of 120 that’s been hanging around in the fridge for a few years. I’m not sure why, but it appeared to have been put into a camera and then taken out again. That meant no packaging, or the little bit of tape that identifies the film. I only had the note that I’d scrawled on it so turned to Google and sure enough, found pictures of FP4 backing paper that looked the same as the roll I had.

What I didn’t check was what other Ilford film have and know now that they’re all the same. I guess this saves a few quid during manufacture, but was a bit of a party pooper for me…

screen-shot-2016-10-09-at-19-49-13Once I’d shot the roll and, thanks to the sealing tape at the other end, realised that it was actually HP5+, I couldn’t find any recipe for the film shot at 125iso, only 400 (or faster). It would be so over-exposed that it was going to need very gentle treatment. But a brief Twitter exchange with @IlfordPhoto and I had a solution – how’s that for customer service?

 

And so to the results. I shot the first few frames in our local church. I was helping to document it’s refurbishment, but rather than the 600 year old artefacts, my eye was taken by the sunlight playing on the wooden chairs, covered in plastic sheeting. not-fp4not-fp4-2Later the same day, as the Autumnal murk closed in, I snapped a few frames in the nature reserve nearby. I was using these as test frames for a look that I hope to use more often to document those same fields. I was looking for branches and grasses that were picked out by the fading sunlight, but with shade behind, hoping that they’d silhouette nicely in black and white.not-fp4-4not-fp4-3not-fp4-5And finally, a few frames shot in our shed. The previous owner left some pretty heavy duty fencing and posts that I photographed a couple of weeks ago and I was keen to shoot them again on film when I next had black and white in the Yashica. The light through the filthy windows is lovely…not-fp4-6not-fp4-7not-fp4-9not-fp4-8So while the mix up meant that I had to shoot a roll of FP4+ in a few hours for the party yesterday, I’m pretty pleased with the stuff I got from this roll. It shows that film is pretty forgiving stuff, and even when over-exposed well beyond its recommended limits, it’ll still produce good results.


Gubbins:

Yashica-Mat 124G (with a broken meter so I used a Sekonic), Ilford FP4+ HP5+, Ilfotec HC at 1:60 for 6:30, scanned at home and run through Lightroom to get rid of the dust and bump up the contrast a bit.

My previous entries on 52 Rolls are here.

3 replies to “00000 Million

  1. Like you I have always tended to rate film at box speed but then I have tended to be lazy and just meter from a mid grey somewhere in the frame that was lit the same way as the subject. Doing some reading recently it would appear that a lot of film stock can handle significant overexposure and still produce good results, Kodak Portra 400 can work well when overexposed by up to 7 or 8 stops! Similarly HP5+ and Tri-X can also handle overexposure well. Planning on experimenting with rating at half box speed and exposing for the shadows to guve around 3 stops of overexposure to see what I get. Have also seen recommendations that subsequent overdevelopment then helps with contrast in the negative.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this:
close-alt close collapse comment ellipsis expand gallery heart lock menu next pinned previous reply search share star