Following the prescriptive exercises of the previous section of my photography course, I fancied a project outside of the syllabus that would challenge me in other ways.
As I mentioned earlier in the course, asking people to take their picture is not something I’ve been comfortable with in the past, despite the subject almost always agreeing when I have. So, in an attempt to address this, I’ve begun to photograph ‘strangers’ in our local country park.
This isn’t as sinister as it first sounds. The portraits are ‘people aware’ and I have asked permission for each. In the pictures, I’ve looked to capture the relationship between the park and its users and some of the feeling that the people have for the place. Each picture has been taken within the park and I’ve made sure that by producing full-length portraits, that the subject’s surroundings are visible, even if out of focus. I wanted the park to take equal billing in each picture as the subject.
I am interested in recording the people and groups that use the park and the reasons that they do so. It is a special place and I realise how lucky I am to live so close by – a feeling that is becoming stronger as I talk to more strangers as I photograph them.
the key is to remain aware of what you’re setting out to do, and what results are likely to satisfy you. It matters little that the intention may only be sketchy; knowing it will always help the design.
Returning to Michael Freeman’s thoughts on intent, I set myself the following guiding principles and set off wandering the park:
- include the items that people bring to the park – scooters, nets, frisbees, blankets, picnics etc
- when possible, include all members of each group as I am interested to record who people come to the park with – individuals, family groups, couples etc.
- shoot in different areas of the park, not all on main through road
- think about the background – reduce (blown-out) sky and look for features. I wasn’t asking people to move from wherever it was that I met them, only turning them on the spot if it improved light or background
- the look of the set would be informed by Keith Greenough’s set of female landscape photographers and in turn, Bernhard Fuch
- no flash or reflectors, only hand held with a 50mm to keep consistency
- recording mid-2010s in a way that August Sander recorded early 20th century, but without the formality or knowing anything about the subject
- provide no direction of how people are to stand or if they should smile
- try to keep interaction brief, but light-hearted and courteous – don’t want to cause inconvenience and afterall, I want something from them. “Hello, 2 shots and a ‘thank you'”
50 pictures in and I’m enjoying myself! The more times you ask, the easier it gets. The response has been great from just about everyone that I’ve approached. I did begin to self-censor, thinking that I’d got ‘enough dog-walking, middle-aged, white ladies’ for example. This made me consider if I was trying to show an accurate demographic representation of the users or just the ‘interesting’ people and I’m still not sure of the answer.
The project has already taught me a lot about my own opinion forming process and how far off the mark visual first-impressions can be. By extension, portraits will always be subjective and the viewer of these photographs will form their own opinions of the people featured, despite there being little information to go on. The way people dress is less of a clue to their social standing, employment status or history than it was in Sander’s day.
The subjects didn’t know they were going to be photographed. They haven’t dressed up or applied make-up as they may have if they’d received an invitation in advance. It’s halfway to Phillip Lorca-DiCorcia’s Heads that showed how people look when they don’t think anyone is watching. Interestingly, one or two have run their fingers through there hair or re-arranged their clothing showing a different attitude to people looking at a picture of them, rather than just seeing them in public.
Similarly, I felt it important not to tell my new friends if they should smile or how to stand. If I had, I’m influencing the opinions formed by the photograph’s viewer by managing the subject’s behaviour.
The creation and subsequent reading of photographic portraits is a complicated but fascinating area of the study of photography (and psychology) that I’d not really considered before now, but expect will come during the People and Place module. For now, I’ll carry on until I’ve collected 100 strangers, before deciding how best to show the results. In the meantime, I’ll continue to add to this Flickr set.
Other observations made during the first few shoots:
- in the warm weather I found it difficult approaching women who weren’t wearing much and asking to photograph them
- sunny weekend afternoons are too busy
- the only refusal was ‘for religious reasons’
- no-one asked to see their picture or for my contact details
- I was entertained by people’s initial shock when spoken to by a stranger – I wasn’t jumping out on them. I saw that look that I guess city-centre charity fundraisers see two-hundred times a day
- everyone has a story and there is so much love for the park. It is peoples gym, garden, playground and stress-relief
Freeman, M (2007) The photographer’s eye – Composition for Better Digital Photos. Lewes; The Ilex Press
Greenough, K (13 May 2013) Portraits in context [Online] Available from: http://photo-graph.org/2014/05/13/portraits-in-context/ [Accessed: 6 August 2014]
[…] oca, photography, photos · Leave a comment As I’ve continued to take pictures for my Bradgate Strangers project, I’ve also kept up the reading and research into portrait photography and similar […]
[…] I wasn’t really sure what to take them of.So I gathered up some gear and headed to nearby Bradgate Park to see what damage Storm Doris had […]